We’ll clear one thing up immediately concerning today’s above blog headline before delving into the subject matter of an informative opinion piece.
We suspect at the Somerville Law Office of Rajeh A. Saadeh that many readers of our family law blogs like art. Many of them likely collect various types of art that speak to them in meaningful ways, like sculptures, carvings, photographs and paintings.
It’s not all about simply toasting yourself in the mirror if/when you obtain a divorce settlement that leaves you unquestionably rich and likely financially advantaged for the rest of your life.
We note on our New Jersey family law website a somewhat common viewpoint concerning a specific divorce-linked legal instrument. We stress at the proven Law Office of Rajeh A. Saadeh in Somerville that, “Some people say prenuptial agreements are contrary to the basis of marriage.”
We conclude with today’s blog entry a multi-post look at a singular concern for select divorcing couples in New Jersey and nationally.
We referenced a landmine that potentially exists for select New Jersey divorcing parties in our immediately preceding blog post. We noted in our September 11 entry that material and unanticipated problems can arise for soon-to-be exes who “fail to properly distinguish among different forms of income during the dissolution process.”
Income is, well, income.
Reflectively. Patiently. As dispassionately as possible.
It’s insurance, after all.
It’s kind of like the central software program or operating system that drives the New Jersey divorce computer for impending exes who have children.